The Recovery of Indirect Costs
A
Necessary Source of Revenue for the Advancement of Texas Tech University
If Texas Tech University is to continue progressing toward
its goal of being recognized as a major research university, we must recover
and retain all of the indirect costs we earn.
In order to do this, we must have the cooperation and support of the
faculty. Garnering such faculty support is contingent upon
their having a complete understanding of indirect costs and of the associated
benefits that accrue to Texas Tech University=s research programs.
Robert M. Sweazy
Vice President for Research and Tech
Transfer
What
costs are involved in research?
Funded
research involves two types of costs, direct costs and indirect costs. The Principal Investigator has explicit
control over expenditures for direct costs, those costs that are directly
related to and easily identified with his or her research project. Equipment, supplies, salaries, fringe benefits,
and travel related to the project are examples of direct costs.
The concept
of indirect costs, on the other hand, is a budgeting mechanism used both in
private industry and in public institutions.
Identifying the costs of such items as utilities, facility maintenance,
and accounting and charging them to each individual project would be an almost
impossible task that would further increase paperwork and the costs of
conducting research. Instead,
universities use indirect costs to charge to sponsors those costs that are
associated with the conduct of sponsored projects, but are difficult to
identify specifically with any single project.
Although they are more difficult to identify, these administrative and
infrastructure costs are still a very necessary component in the conduct of the
Principal Investigator=s research. The Federal government refers to indirect
costs as facilities and administrative costs.
The Federal
government defines facilities and administrative (F&A) costs as those costs
that are incurred for common or joint objectives and therefore cannot be
identified readily and specifically with a particular sponsored project, an
instructional activity, or any other institutional activity. Rather than trying to bill all of these
costs to each project individually, an F&A cost rate is applied to the
sponsored project at the time the budget is prepared.
What
makes up facilities and administrative costs?
The Federal
government allows universities to be reimbursed for facilities and
administrative costs associated with sponsored activities related to:
$
Depreciation
and use allowances
- use of buildings and equipment;
$
Operation
and maintenance expenses - costs of all utilities and services such as janitorial services,
security, fire protection, etc.;
$
General
administrative expenses - a portion of general administrative expenses including the President=s office, business operations, legal
counsel, college deans and departmental administration; sponsored projects
administration and student administration and services; (Note: student administration
and services costs are only applicable to Instruction and Training grants,
contracts, and agreements.)
$
Library
expenses - based on
the proportion of user population associated with separately budgeted research.
How are
F&A cost rates established?
The F&A
rate is not a number that is arbitrarily selected. Negotiations of this rate between Texas Tech and the Federal
government have occurred as often as annually, and as infrequently as every
three years. Several steps must be
completed by universities before the Federal government will approve an
institution=s F&A rate. Annual operating expenses of the primary
activities of the institution are distributed into the previously noted cost
categories. These expenses are further
distributed within each cost category among the university=s primary activities including
instruction, organized research,
service, and auxiliary enterprises.
This information becomes the basis for Texas Tech=s proposal when it enters into
negotiations with the Federal government to establish each component of, and
the overall F&A cost rate. The
university and the Federal government must decide what portions of the costs
should be allocated to sponsored research and what portions should be allocated
to the institution=s other activities.
Once an
institution=s F&A cost rate has been agreed
upon, Federal agencies recognize this rate and, unless prohibited by statute,
accept F&A costs calculated at this rate as a part of the project
budget. The agreed upon F&A cost
rate is typically kept in effect for a two- to three-year period before it is
renegotiated to take into account changes in the F&A costs associated with
the conduct of research.
What are
the components of Texas Tech=s current F&A cost rate?
Texas Tech
University=s current government-approved
F&A cost rate for research is comprised of the following components:
Building Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 1.0%
Equipment Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.5%
Operations and Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . 14.9%
Library . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 1.00%
Administration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
26.0%
Negotiated
Rate (Percentage). . . . . . . . .
46.5%
Texas Tech=s F&A cost rate for instruction
and training is the same as the indirect cost rate for research. Although our cost studies indicate that the
actual F&A costs associated with instruction and training projects are much
higher than for research projects, federal negotiators are generally unwilling
to negotiate a separate, higher F&A cost rate for instruction and training
projects.
A separate
F&A cost rate of 26% also has been established for research projects that
are considered off-campus research projects.
Projects are considered off-campus when the activities are performed in
facilities not owned by Texas Tech and to which rent is directly allocated to
the project(s). The off-campus F&A
cost rate does not include Building Use, Equipment Use,
Operations and maintenance, and Library because projects conducted in
off-campus facilities have easily identifiable site-specific costs that can be
charged directly to the research project.